The Gay Argument

In gay politics, it has become the norm to lend credence to the gay rights movement by arguing that “being gay is not a choice”. My aim here is not to evaluate the veracity of this statement, but rather to contend that this argument is both unnecessary and pernicious to the cause.The crux of the gay rights movement is whether or not non-heterosexual individuals should be afforded the same rights as their heterosexual counterparts when it comes to issues such as marriage, tax breaks, etc. Although I firmly believe that they should, it is not on the grounds that one can’t help being gay, but rather on the notion that consenting adults should have the right to dictate their amorous and sexual affairs. The two main issues with arguing that “being gay is not a choice” are as follow: (1) Just because one can’t help being a certain way does not make it socially or morally acceptable. Ex: Pedophiles may like children, but it is not acceptable for them to outwardly manifest their proclivities. (2) This line of argument draws a strong parallel between being gay and being sick, which in the end makes homosexuality seem like a mere symptom that needs to be remedied. Ex: A person with Tourette’s syndrome can’t help outbursts and must be medicated or subjected to therapy. Initially it may have been useful to argue along this line as it might have garnered sympathy from the opposition (by making the gay person seem like a victim of his homosexuality). But I believe now is a time of empowerment. Whether or not being gay is a choice is superfluous; the quest for gay rights should be about the freedom to construct one’s identity and achieve happiness. Please let me know what you think. I am open to suggestions.